ABSTRACT
Aim: During the coronavirus disease, a palliative approach was recommended for the management of endodontic emergencies. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of dexamethasone or ibuprofen-acetaminophen combination for pain management in endodontic emergencies. Material(s) and Method(s): One hundred and eight records of patients who presented to the emergency department with dental pain were evaluated retrospectively. Since interventional procedures were not performed during the pandemic period, Specific analgesics/antibiotics for the management of pain were preferred. A follow-up protocol with a questionnaire was developed to observe the effectiveness of palliative treatment and make changes if necessary. All participants received a questionnaire to rate the pain levels 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours after taking the drug. All data were collected from the patient file and assessed. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, 32 patients were included (n = 19, ibuprofen + acetaminophen;n = 13, dexamethasone). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test (P = 0.05). Result(s): In both groups, a significant decrease in pain was experienced immediately after medication and at 6, 12, and 18 hours, with no significant difference (P >.05). However, dexamethasone (Group II) resulted in lower pain levels than ibuprofen\acetaminophen (Group I) at 24 and 48 hours (P <.05) Discussion: Both dexamethasone and ibuprofen-acetaminophen can be good palliative choices in endodontic emergencies in pandemic conditions. However, at 24 and 48 hours, dexamethasone resulted in lower pain levels.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: Corticosteroids are widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 caused by SARS-CoV- 2 as they attenuate the immune response with their antiinflammatory properties. Genetic polymorphisms of glucocorticoid receptor, metabolizing enzymes or transporters may affect treatment response to dexamethasone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of polymorphisms in glucocorticoid pathway with disease severity and duration of dexamethasone treatment in COVID-19 patients. Method(s): Our study included 107 hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone. We isolated DNA from peripheral blood and genotyped all samples for polymorphisms in NR3C1 (rs6198, rs33388), CYP3A4 (rs35599367), CYP3A5 (rs776746), GSTP1 (rs1695, rs1138272), GSTM1/GSTT1 deletions and ABCB1 (1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582 Fisher's and Mann- Whitney tests were used in statistical analysis. Result(s): The median (min-max) age of the included patients was 62 (26-85) years, 69.2 % were male and 30.8 % female and they had moderate (1.9 %), severe (83 %) or critical (15.1 %) disease. NR3C1 rs6198 polymorphism was associated with more severe disease in additive genetic model (P = 0.022). NR3C1 rs6198, ABCB1 rs1045642 and ABCB1 rs1128503 polymorphisms were associated with a shorter duration of dexamethasone treatment in additive (P = 0.048, P = 0.047 and P = 0.024, respectively) and dominant genetic models (P = 0.015, P = 0.048 and P = 0.020, respectively), while carriers of the polymorphic CYP3A4 rs35599367 allele required longer treatment with dexamethasone (P = 0.033). Other polymorphisms were not associated with disease severity or dexamethasone treatment duration. Conclusion(s): Genetic variability of glucocorticoid pathway genes was associated with the duration of dexamethasone treatment of COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe hyper inflammatory condition caused by the over-activation and proliferation of T cells, NK cells and macrophages. It is often associated with complications of rheumatic/immune diseases. We present a case of a 15-year-old female who experiences recurrent episodes of MAS without any known definitive underlying etiology. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old previously healthy female developed fatigue, fevers, myalgia, chest pain, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy 10 days after receiving her first Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Her symptoms recurred 10 days after receiving the second dose. Her myocarditis, MIS-C, and infectious work up was negative except for positive EBV IgG. Laboratory studies revealed anemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hyperferritinemia. She initially responded to decadron;however, her symptoms recurred with steroid taper. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hemophagocytosis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in UNC13D c.962C>A (p.Thr321Asn). She had multiple re-admissions with significantly elevated inflammatory markers, including extremely high IL2-R, IL-18 and CXCL9. Each episode was complicated by an acute viral infection. She responds to high dose steroids, anti-IL-1, and JAK inhibitors. Nonetheless, it has been difficult to wean decadron without triggering a flare. She continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib. Discussion(s): MAS may be seen as a complication of rheumatic diseases, as well as inborn errors of immunity. However, none of these conditions have been diagnosed in this patient despite extensive testing, including WES. The degree of her immune dysregulation has been very severe making her disease process unpredictable and extremely difficult to control. She has frequent flares precipitated by viral infections or attempts at adjusting her immunomodulators. Weaning her medications has been challenging as she continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib and corticosteroids. The UNC13D gene is associated with autosomal recessive familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 3 (FHL3). Our patient is heterozygous for an UNC13D variant of uncertain significance. Additional genetic inquiries with whole genome sequencing to help elucidate the underlying etiology of her severe condition is being conducted. We hypothesize she developed MAS due to a combination of genetic predisposition, prior EBV infection, and immune stress associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Intensive care units (ICUs) collapsed under the global wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, we designed a clinical decision-making model that can help predict at hospital admission what patients with COVID-19 are at higher risk of requiring critical care. Method(s): This was a cross-sectional study in 119 patients that met hospitalization criteria for COVID-19 including less than 30 breaths per minute, peripheral oxygen saturation < 93%, and/or >= 50% lung involvement on imaging. Depending on the need for critical care, patients were retrospectively assigned to ICU and non-ICU groups. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were collected at admission and analyzed by classification and regression tree (CRT). Result(s): Forty-five patients were admitted to ICU and 80% of them were men older than 57.13 +/- 12.80 years on average. The leading comorbidity in ICU patients was hypertension. The CRT revealed that direct bilirubin (DB) > 0.315 mg/dl together with the neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR) > 15.90 predicted up to correctly in 92% of the patients the requirement of intensive care management, with sensitivity of 93.2%. Preexisting comorbidities did not influence on the tree growing. Conclusion(s): At hospital admission, DB and NMR can help identify nine in 10 patients with COVID-19 at higher risk of ICU admission.Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Medica del Hospital General de Mexico.
ABSTRACT
In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.
ABSTRACT
Organ transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive drugs and hence are at high risk for COVID-19 due to their compromised immunity. This study assessed 1,370 liver transplant recipients who were followed at our hospital. A total of 12 patients got COVID-19: 5 recipients <50-years-old had mild disease, 7 recipients >60-years-old had moderate to severe disease, and 2 patients died. In addition, not all patients received 2 vaccinations, suggesting that the immunization is important for COVID-19 prophylaxis even in this patient population. One recipient was successfully treated with a combination of a reduced dose of immunosuppressive drugs, dexamethasone, remdesivir, and antibiotics, which is being established as an effective therapy for COVID-19.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) proteins play an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival and represent an attractive therapeutic target. In prior trials, a subgroup analysis of patients with t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM showed the combination of a Bcl-2 inhibitor, a proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival with no increased mortality. BGB-11417, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is more potent and selective than venetoclax. BGB-11417- 105 (NCT04973605) is a phase 1b/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of BGB-11417 monotherapy, in combination with dexamethasone, or with dexamethasone+carfilzomib in patients with t(11;14)-positive R/R MM. Preliminary safety results for the combination of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone are presented. Method(s): Eligible patients had t(11;14)-positive R/R MM and had been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received 80-, 160-, 320-, or 640-mg BGB-11417 daily with 40-mg dexamethasone weekly until death, intolerability, or disease progression. Dose escalation was guided by a mTPI-2 design and overall review by a safety monitoring committee. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. Result(s): As of 1 July 2022, 10 patients were enrolled in the 80-, 160-, and 320-mg (3 patients each) and 640-mg (1 patient) dose-escalation cohorts of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone. The median age was 69 years (range, 52-81) and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-5). The median treatment duration was 3.2 months (range, 0.5-6.5). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level. Three patients died whilst on study: 1 due to COVID-19 complications 157 days after treatment discontinuation (day 208), 1 due to progressive disease 50 days after treatment discontinuation (day 89), and 1 due to COVID-19 whilst on study treatment (day 78). No deaths were associated with study treatment. Two patients experienced Grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One patient in the 160-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 increase in liver enzymes and lymphopenia. One patient in the 320-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 lymphopenia. The most common TEAEs were insomnia (50%), fatigue (30%), arthralgia (20%), back pain (20%), lymphopenia (20%), and nausea (20%). BGB-11417 exposure increased dose-dependently from 80 mg to 320 mg with high interpatient PK variability. BGB-11417 exposures after single and multiple doses appeared similar, indicating limited accumulation. Conclusion(s): BGB-11417 plus dexamethasone was generally well-tolerated in patients with R/R MM harbouring t(11;14) at doses <=640 mg. Efficacy data are forthcoming. Recruitment is ongoing in the US, Australia, and New Zealand;the BGB-11417, dexamethasone, and carfilzomib combination arm will open in the future.
ABSTRACT
Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The introduction of dexamethasone in the treatment of COVID-19 began in late 2020 after evidence emerged demonstrating that treatment with corticosteroids reduced mortality in those infected with severe COVID-19.1 Current guidelines suggest the use of Dexamethasone 6mg OD for 7-10 days for those requiring oxygen. A small proportion of patients in the intensive care unit do not respond to the usual dosing of dexamethasone. A treatment often advocated following discussion with the regional ECMO centre was high-dose steroid therapy.2-3 No guidance existed regarding the use of high-dose steroids in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. We believed there was inconsistency in patient selection, screening, dosing and monitoring. A protocol was needed to simplify this process. Objective(s): To develop a simple protocol for the use of high-dose steroids in COVID-19 related ARDS that provided the user with information on: 1. When to consider high-dose steroids 2. The precautions that should be taken to exclude infection prior to commencing high-dose steroids 3. The monitoring required while receiving high-dose steroids 4. A proposed treatment regimen Methodology and Results: A literature review of treatment regimens for high-dose steroids in COVID-19 ARDS was undertaken. We also included trials involving non-COVID-19 ARDS.3-4 A local evidence-based protocol for the use of high-dose steroids in COVID-19 related ARDS was designed. Following peer review by the wider MDT the protocol was first trialled, reviewed, and then adopted. An extended guideline with scientific context together with a quick reference bedside poster were launched. Conclusion(s): The protocol provided a user-friendly summary of the information required to safely use high-dose steroids for the treatment of COVID-19 related ARDS. The algorithm has now been adopted in several units and has been submitted for consideration as a network wide resource. Feedback from users has been positive and we will seek to review and update this guidance as further evidence emerges in this evolving condition.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Immunocompromised patients are susceptible to high-risk opportunistic infections and malignant diseases. If available, most antiviral and antifungal drugs are quite toxic, relatively ineffective, and induce resistance in the long term. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): We have previously demonstrated the safety of adoptive cell therapy for COVID-19 patients with CD45RA negative cells containing SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells from a donor, chosen based on HLA compatibility and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools. After finishing a Phase 2 randomized multicenter clinical trial (RELEASE, NCT04578210), we concluded that the infusion is safe, effective, accelerates lymphocyte recovery and shows hallmarks of an immune response. To use adoptive cell therapy to treat COVID-19 it would be necessary to develop a biobank of living drugs. For that, we examined the immune evolution performing a longitudinal analysis from previously SARS-CoV-2 infected and infection- naive individuals covering 21 months from infection. Cellular responses were maintained over time while humoral responses increased after vaccination but were gradually lost. Therefore, the best donors would be recovered individuals and two months after vaccination. We also evaluated the effect of dexamethasone (current standard of care treatment for COVID-19 and other infections involving lymphopenia) and Interleukin-15 (cytokine involved in T-cell maintenance and survival) on CD45RA negative. Dexamethasone did not alter cell functionality, proliferation or phenotype at a clinical-practice concentration, while interleukin-15 increased the memory T-cell and T-regulatory cell activation state, and interferon gamma release. Furthermore, we applied the adoptive passive transfer of CD45RA negative cells containing pathogen-specific memory T-cells to other infectious diseases characterized by sustained lymphopenia. We infused six immunocompromised patients with Cytomegalovirus, BK virus, Aspergillus, and Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease. Patients experienced pathogen clearance, resolution of symptoms and lymphocyte increase. Transient microchimerism was detected in three patients. The use of CD45RA negative cells containing specific memory T cells of a third-party donor for treating severe pathogenic diseases in immunocompromised patients is feasible, safe, and effective, and has an advantage over other cell therapies such as lower costs and a less complex regulatory environment.Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Dexamethasone is the first and an important therapy that significantly reduces the risk of death in patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Nevertheless, a lot of studies have revealed that it has adverse impacts on multiple systems of the body especially the reproductive system, and dexamethasone exposure during the human foetal period may be associated with various diseases. In this paper, we reviewed the literature regarding the adverse effects of COVID-19 and dexamethasone administration on the reproductive system as well as related disease pathogenesis, in an attempt to clarify the potential harms of dexamethasone treatment in COVID-19 patients. Overall, we strongly support the application of dexamethasone as a pharmaceutical therapy in critical COVID-19 patients before a better therapy is developed, but the adverse side effects that may arise cannot be ignored. Our review will help medical professionals in the prognosis and follow-up of patients treated with dexamethasone. In addition, given that a considerable amount of uncertainty, confusion and even controversy that still remains, further studies and more clinical trials are urgently needed to improve the understanding of the parameters and the effects of dexamethasone on reproductive function of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period, in the treatment approved by the WHO, along with antivirals, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants, dexamethasone was always used. This study started from the professional concern related to the vasopressor effect of cortisone on blood pressure (BP). METHODS: The study group was achieved by selecting, from a total of 356 patients hospitalized in the clinic, the patients with known hypertensive status at admission for SARS-CoV-2. Dexamethasone was part of the anti-COVID-19 treatment, with an administration of 4-6-8 mg/day, depending on bodyweight, for 10 days. All patients with hypertension received antihypertensive treatment in adjusted doses according to the recorded BP values. RESULTS: Monitoring of BP in hospitalized patients was performed daily, in the morning and evening. If on the 2nd day of treatment, 84% of the patients partially responded to the treatment with a moderate decrease in BP, on the 3rd therapy day, the situation clearly improved: more than 75% of the patients had values of BP that can be classified as high-normal (38.23%) and normal (40.03%). CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not have a notable influence on increasing BP, because the doses were low-moderate and prescribed for a short time.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION. Moderate to severe respiratory distress among patients with COVID-19 is associated with a high mortality. This study evaluated ventilator support and mortality by Do Intubate (DI) or Do Not Intubate (DNI) orders. METHODS. This was a retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 and a supplemental oxygen requirement of 15 l/min. The patients were divided into two groups corresponding to the first and second wave of COVID-19 and were subsequently further divided according to DI and DNI orders and analysed regarding need of ventilator support and mortality. RESULTS. The study included 178 patients. The mortality was 24% for patients with DI orders (n = 115) and 81% for patients with DNI orders (n = 63) increasing to 98% (n = 46) for patients with DNI orders and very high flow oxygen requirements ( 30 l/min.). From the first to the second wave of COVID-19, the use of constant continuous positive airway pressure (cCPAP) increased from 71% to 91% (p < 0.001), whereas the use of mechanical ventilation decreased from 54% to 28% (odds ratio = 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.85)). CONCLUSION. The mortality was high for patients with DNI orders and respiratory distress with very high levels in supplemental oxygen in both the first and second wave of COVID-19 despite an increase in use of cCPAP and treatment with dexamethasone and remdesivir during the second wave. Hence, careful evaluation on transition to palliative care must be considered for these patients.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is currently a global health crisis and is caused by a new strain of coronavirus. However, emerging literature of case reports noted possible extrapulmonary manifestations of the disease. Because COVID 19 is a relatively new disease, at present, little existing literature tackles the diagnosis and therapeutic management of COVID-19-related conditions outside the pulmonary system. Method(s): This is a case of a 24-year-old male presented with the chief complaint of sudden stiffening of all extremities. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan was unremarkable. Chest X-ray revealed interstitial pneumonia and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR (OPS/NPS) was positive. Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings showed supraventricular tachycardia and had elevated Troponin I levels. Pertinent physical findings noted were slurring of speech, dysmetria, and vertical nystagmus. Finding(s): The patient was initially treated as a case of Bacterial Abscess versus Viral encephalitis. Pericardial ultrasound revealed small pericardial effusion and was started on Colchicine. Repeat cranial CT scan noted unremarkable results but due to persistence of symptoms, the patient was started with Dexamethasone. On Day 16 of illness, the patient was noted to have full resolution of symptoms. Rapid antibody testing was done which revealed positive for both IgG and IgM hence the patient was discharged with the final diagnosis of Viral Myopericarditis resolved, Viral encephalitis resolved, COVID-19 pneumonia recovered. Conclusion(s): Extrapulmonary manifestations have been reported increasingly as an atypical presentation of COVID 19 infection. Early recognition of viral myopericarditis and viral encephalitis as a manifestation of COVID 19 can lead to the initiation of proper treatment and management. More reports on these cases can aid future studies on diagnostics and therapeutic approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Liver injury is frequently seen in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it has been reported to be associated with the severity of COVID-19. The direct action of the virus, cytokine storm, coagulation abnormalities, drug-induced, etc. are considered to be the causes of liver injury, and antiviral agents against COVID-19 and steroids used as anti-inflammatory agents have also been reported to contribute to the appearance of liver injury. In Japan, remdesivir, dexamethasone (Dex), baricitinib, etc. are used as therapeutic agents for COVID-19, but there is still not enough evidence about the frequency of liver injury as an adverse event. Aims & Methods: This study aimed to clarify the influence of Dex monotherapy for liver injury in COVID-19 with respiratory failure. We examined 171 patients with COVID-19 with liver injury in the respiratory failure groups and the nonrespiratory failure groups and investigated 41 patients with moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure who received Dex monotherapy in the liver injury group and the nonliver injury group at the time before treatment. Result(s): The respiratory failure group had 64% more liver damage than the non-respiratory failure group, was older, had more men, and had significantly more complications of lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Obesity was more common in the liver injury group prior to Dex monotherapy, and the liver CT value was significantly lower than in the non-liver injury group. Liver injury worsened in 41% of patients after Dex monotherapy, but there was no significant difference in the frequency before Dex monotherapy between the liver injury group and the non-liver injury group, and the degree of liver injury was mild in all cases, improving in 38% of the liver injury group. Conclusion(s): Dex monotherapy was a safe treatment for moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure, which frequently resulted in liver injury.
ABSTRACT
This chapter gives a broad overview of nephrology as it affects hospitalists while also hoping to answer a few of the essential questions hospitalists may ask their nephrology colleagues. Evaluation and treatment of both acute and chronic kidney disease is constantly evolving as the small but tight-knit community of hospital-nephrologists continue to collect, review, and research data. The majority of the chapter will be focused on discussing a few new updates in the field of nephrology and how these updates could potentially change hospital care. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 is a highly contagious virus that can affect almost any system in the body. New developments in understanding its transmissibility, management, and sequelae are unfolding almost daily. However, no medical publication in 2021 would be complete without a snapshot of the current status of this pandemic. The virus continues to mutate to more contagious, and therefore more dangerous, strains. The best path forward through this pandemic is vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 for all those who are eligible. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, was recently demonstrated to be the only medication capable of reducing mortality in severe COVID disease in the UK's Recovery Trial. There is a need to compare different steroids because it is well recognised that different corticosteroids have varied pharmacodynamic properties. The aim of our study was to compare outcomes in severe or critical COVID-19 when treated with Dexamethasone versus Methyl prednisolone. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental, non-randomized study to determine whether intravenous or oral dexamethasone reduces mortality compared with intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with severe or critical COVID-19.The study was conducted on all patients aged 18 and over admitted at a 700-bedded academic medical center.The primary outcome was the mortality. The secondary outcome included length of stay. Finding(s): A total of 706 hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID- 19 were included in the study. There were n=217 patients in Dexamethasone group, n= 393 patients in Methylprednisolone group and n=96 patients who did not receive steroids.Among the baseline characteristics between the groups, there was no significant difference in median age (55 years in dexamethsone group vs 57 years in methyl prednisolone group p=0.09). There was male predominance in methylprednisolone group (74% versus 54% p<0.001) and a greater proportion of patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation (13.7% versus 3.2% p<0.001). Mortality was found to be significantly higher in methylprednisolone group compared to dexamethasone group on univariate logistic regression analysis (13.7% versus 3.2% p<0.001) and longer length of stay (7 days versus 4 days p<0.001). In multivariable model, dexamethsone was found to be associated with lower risk of mortality (aOR: 0.24;95% CI: (0.09- 0.62)(p=0.003) and lesser length of stay (aOR: 0.87;95% CI: (0.82-0.92) (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): Dexamethasone was associated with lower mortality and lesser length of stay when compared to Methyl prednisolone in moderate to critical COVID-19.Copyright © 2023